Mezzanine finance
has the characteristics of both debt and equity capital and is
essentially a mix of both. This type of financing is usually availed by
companies which have either expansion or restructuring plans and acquisition
goals. It can be in the form of subordinated debt which is referred to as
mezzanine debt or in the form of equity preferred shares referred to as
mezzanine equity finance. Mezzanine finance is subordinate to senior debt and
venture capital finance but has preference over equity stockholders. This means
that if the company that has availed the finance, defaults or is liquidated,
the mezzanine finance lenders will be paid only after senior debt lenders and
venture capitalists charges are satisfied but will be treated superior to
equity holders.
If the borrower fails
to repay back the loan as per the schedule or in its entirety, the debt can be
converted to equity and the lenders will then hold an equity interest in the
company. Mezzanine finance therefore will be issued in the form of convertible
debt with attached warrants that entitles the lenders to crystallize an equity
interest (ownership interest) in the company if repayment terms are not adhered
to. There is also a provision for the borrower to buyback this equity interest
at a pre-specified price from the lender.
Why do borrowers seek Mezzanine finance?
Seekers of mezzanine
finance are usually companies with an established reputation and having a sound
track record. When the balance sheet of such fundamentally strong companies do
not allow for any more traditional bank lending and which have already gone
public, they look for mezzanine lenders for making good the shortfall in
funding for a growth plan which primarily would have already been funded. To
fill in this gap is very critical for the company to achieve its strategy.
Also, the company would require these funds at a very short notice and
generally, they would try to repay back these loans very quickly. This is why
mezzanine financiers lend the funds without conducting much due diligence and
in many cases even collateral would not be obtained. However, lenders have
recourse by way of conversion of debt into equity ownership of the company in
case borrower defaults. This right works as a substitute in lieu of collateral.
Also, when companies
opt for mezzanine finance, it is treated as equity in accounting perspective.
This provides room for availing more usual bank finance for the company.
Another motivation for borrowers to seek mezzanine finance is to partner their
risk with a financial institution.
What motivates institutions to lend mezzanine funds?
Mezzanine lenders
provide finance only to companies that have strong cash flows, profitability
and other fundamentals. The company should have a respectable track record and
a robust reputation. Also, the finance is provided to companies which have
expansion or acquisition (management/leveraged buyouts) plans which would help
the company to generate more profit in future. The lending institutions have
complete confidence in the company's ability to pursue profits which is why
they do not demand collateral or very negligible collateral. Mezzanine lenders
do have board observation rights.
Mezzanine lenders
hunt for returns ranging between 20 to 30% as the loans are riskier than the
usual bank loans. Usually the requirement of borrowers would be short term and
temporary in nature. However, the tenure of mezzanine finance could range from
2 to 7 years i.e. it could be medium or long term. The lenders hedge the risk
of default by structuring warrants in the loan. If loan is not repaid in time,
the lenders can convert the debt into equity by invoking these warrants.
How is mezzanine finance different from a bridge loan?
Many a times, the
term 'bridge loan' is used synonymously with 'Mezzanine Finance'. However,
bridge loans are very short term in nature (usually 12 months). Sometimes, the
borrower institution would have an immediate requirement of funds to meet its
present liabilities and in situations like these; it would be difficult for the
institution to arrange quick finance through its permanent sources. In such
cases, bridge loan serves as an apt way out. The high risk associated with a
bridge loan is compensated to the lender by way of high interest. Unlike in
mezzanine finance, a bridge loan lender demands collateral to attenuate his
risk position. As compared to bridge loan, mezzanine finance could be medium or
long term in nature ranging anywhere between 2 to 7 years.
An example
When Tata-Jaguar deal
was struck in 2008, Tata Motors availed bridge loan for financing of the
acquisition. Unfortunately, due to the financial crisis of 2007-2009, the
bridge loan had to be restructured. When the deal materialized, there was a lot
of criticism by the business community regarding the success of the deal due to
non-visibility of the synergies as well as due to encompassing recession which
was expected to dampen the sales. However, the enormous success of this deal is
now evident in the fact that Tata Motors derives its maximum profit from the
JLR segment. This is a classic example of the usefulness of a bridge loan.
In normal investment
and business parlance, bridge loans and mezzanine finance are considered
identical as they serve the purpose of bridging the gap for achievement of an
entity's financial objective.
Comments
Post a Comment